Its easy to make excuses for mistakes in life, but why point a finger, and not just accept defeat? I will be the first to say that failure is extremely hard to admit. We don't like losing, and will do anything to push the blame onto someone else.
Most people you ask will tell you they are competitive in some way. No one likes losing. Its natural selection and animal instinct kicking in. Its like 10,000 years ago when our ancestors were fighting for a piece of antelope they had just killed, who cares about the other guy, its eat or die. In a way, life is very similar. We must put food on the table, which in this day in age is done by working.
In order to keep our jobs we must fight and compete in the office for bonuses, ideas, recognition, and promotion. If we don't, we get a pink slip, and can't support ourselves or families. I generally don't like to write about politics, but one of the candidates running for president supports taxing the people who fight, and work harder, so that the people who are less strong (lazier, dumber, etc.,) can have a better life. Its like saying, "hey, Mr. Hunter, great shot! you killed the antelope with only one arrow and your bare hands. Now because you were so skilled and efficient, give 40% of your kill to your neighbors who don't know how to hunt"
Enough ranting, and back to my point about working hard. I regularly read Silicon Alley Insider and today noticed an article talking about the iPhone, Steve Jobs, and Ivan Seidenberg - CEO of Verizon. Ivan theorizes that Apple will not become a major player in the mobile business because Steve Jobs won't live forever. Is this to say he's rolling over until Steve departs as CEO of Apple? Isn't business about being the best? Why wouldn't he try and change the mobile game by coming up with something better? At least Sprint is trying. They've come out with the Samsung Instinct - comes with a touch screen, and almost every other feature that the iPhone has. When I was in Best Buy earlier today I played with one for 5 minutes. They essentially followed suit on every aspect of the phone, but the Instinct does it about half as well as the iPhone does. I did see one improvement over the iPhone. When you touched the touch sensitive screen, it would vibrate. That feature is missing on the iPhone, and apparently the companies designing these phones thought that tactile feedback was necessary. Jobs and Co. didn't implement a "touch and vibrate" feature on the new iPhone 3G for a number of reasons I am sure, and I am thankful they made that decision. The Instincts "touch and vibrate" function sucked big time and bothered me so much I only played with the phone for 5 minutes over the 20 minutes I could have spent. In my mind, the Instinct is a step back from the iPhone. The sad part about it is, Sprint and Samsung know it - they've already lowered the price by $70 to $129. It just won't be able to compete with a $200 3G iPhone. Its another perfect example of not trying and rolling over and submitting to those who really do try and change the world.
Innovation will be what moves us forward as a society. Free market capitalism and the right to work hard and reap the rewards of a job well done should never be compromised because someone in Washington feels bad for people who are lazy and disadvantaged.
If everyone focused their efforts on trying harder on a daily basis, we might, just might become the United States of America that we once were.